Executive Authority and Due Process in Immigration Cases: Limits on Judicial Review

United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U.S. 253 (1905)

Ensuring Timely Employment Authorization for Asylum Seekers: A Legal Challenge to USCIS Delays

Rosario v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 365 F. Supp. 3d 1156 (W.D. Wash. 2018).

Ensuring Procedural Due Process in Immigration Deportation Proceedings

Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86 (1903).

What Happens to My Pending Asylum Application After Becoming a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR)?

Does the letter I received from USCIS confirming my lawful permanent resident (LPR) status and the abandonment of my asylum application mean that my asylum case is officially closed? Additionally, will I face any issues reentering the U.S. after traveling to my home country?

Due Process Protections for Lawful Permanent Residents Facing Exclusion

Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590 (1953).

Determining Proper Notification in Visa Revocation and Exclusion Proceedings

In re Salazar, 17 I. & N. Dec. 167, 169 (BIA 1979).

Detention During Immigration Proceedings: Clarifying the Scope of Government Authority

Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018).

Credibility and Jurisdiction Challenges in Asylum and Adjustment of Status Proceedings under the Visa Waiver Program

Zine v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 535, 538 (8th Cir. 2008)

Constitutional Limits on Federal Conditions for Grant Funding

City and County of San Francisco v. Sessions, 372 F. Supp. 3d 928 (N.D. Cal. 2019).

Constitutional Boundaries on Federal Welfare Benefits Eligibility for Aliens

Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (1976).

Let’s Get Started

Your legal challenges deserve personalized attention and innovative solutions. Contact Oware Justice Advocates PC today for a consultation and take the first step toward resolution and peace of mind.

355 South Teller Street, Suite 204,
Lakewood, CO 80226
(Visits to the office are strictly by appointment only)

303-514-6589

scrolltop