Clarifying Treaty Investor Status and Intent to Depart in U.S. Immigration Law

Case:Lauvik v. INS, 910 F.2d 658 (9th Cir. 1990).

Clarifying Sovereign Immunity and Judicial Review of Federal Agency Actions

Case: Muniz-Muniz v. U.S. Border Patrol, 741 F.3d 668 (6th Cir. 2013)

Challenging Evidence in Immigration Proceedings: Procedural Fairness in Suppression Hearings

Case: Cruz-Ramos v. Holder, 567 F. App’x 11 (2d Cir. 2014)

Border Searches, Cell Phones, and the Fourth Amendment: Examining the Limits of Law Enforcement Authority

United States v. Djibo, 151 F. Supp. 3d 297 (E.D.N.Y. 2015).

Balancing Individual Rights and Border Security in Federal Drug Conspiracy Cases

United States v. Linarez-Delgado, 259 Fed. App’x 506, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29485 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2007).

Balancing Immigration Protections and Expedited Removal for Vulnerable Children

Osorio-Martinez v. Attorney General of the United States, 893 F.3d 153 (3d Cir. 2018).

Balancing Immigration Enforcement and Fourth Amendment Rights

United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975)

Balancing Federal and State Power: Employment of Undocumented Workers and State Regulation

De Canas v. Bica, 424 U.S. 351 (1976).

Addressing Fair Process in U.S. Deportation Hearings for Asylum Seekers

Dia v. Ashcroft, 353 F.3d 228 (3d Cir. 2003) (en banc).c

Understanding Judicial Review in Expedited Removal Cases

Can an asylum seeker challenge an expedited removal order in U.S. federal court, and does the law allowing limited judicial review violate constitutional rights?

Let’s Get Started

Your legal challenges deserve personalized attention and innovative solutions. Contact Oware Justice Advocates PC today for a consultation and take the first step toward resolution and peace of mind.

355 South Teller Street, Suite 204,
Lakewood, CO 80226
(Visits to the office are strictly by appointment only)

303-514-6589

scrolltop