Case:Lauvik v. INS, 910 F.2d 658 (9th Cir. 1990).
Clarifying Treaty Investor Status and Intent to Depart in U.S. Immigration Law
Case:Lauvik v. INS, 910 F.2d 658 (9th Cir. 1990).
Case: Muniz-Muniz v. U.S. Border Patrol, 741 F.3d 668 (6th Cir. 2013)
Case: Cruz-Ramos v. Holder, 567 F. App’x 11 (2d Cir. 2014)
United States v. Djibo, 151 F. Supp. 3d 297 (E.D.N.Y. 2015).
United States v. Linarez-Delgado, 259 Fed. App’x 506, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29485 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2007).
Osorio-Martinez v. Attorney General of the United States, 893 F.3d 153 (3d Cir. 2018).
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975)
De Canas v. Bica, 424 U.S. 351 (1976).
Dia v. Ashcroft, 353 F.3d 228 (3d Cir. 2003) (en banc).c
Can an asylum seeker challenge an expedited removal order in U.S. federal court, and does the law allowing limited judicial review violate constitutional rights?
Your legal challenges deserve personalized attention and innovative solutions. Contact Oware Justice Advocates PC today for a consultation and take the first step toward resolution and peace of mind.
355 South Teller Street, Suite 204,
Lakewood, CO 80226
(Visits to the office are strictly by appointment only)
303-514-6589
